-
A bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra will pronounce the verdict which was reserved on October 16.
-
The validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act will collide with Section 6B of the controversial CAA
-
The High Court on Wednesday directed the State government to consider appointing a dedicated Commission to conduct the contemporaneous rigorous empirical data qua the reservations for Backward Classes in local bodies in the State in accordance with the Apex Court directions
-
Supreme Court verdict upholding States’ right to regulate taxes on industrial alcohol is a welcome step
-
A bench led by Justice B.R. Gavai criticized the CBI's counsel, warning that it might impose exemplary costs and could also "reward" the probe agency with "compliments" in the form of adverse remarks in its judicial order. Joined by Justice K.V. Vishwanathan, the bench hinted at recording negative comments against the CBI for filing what it deemed a "frivolous" plea solely due to the accused's "high profile" status.
-
Asking the accused to cooperate in the trial, Dhall was released on bail on conditions fixed by the trial court, as per the Supreme Court's order
-
A bench, headed by Justice B.R. Gavai, issued notice on a writ petition filed by Mamta Tripathi seeking quashing of the criminal cases and in the meantime, asked the UP Police to not take any coercive step against the petitioner
-
The resolution also objected to a proposed museum at a location where they had demanded a cafe cum lounge for the members of the Bar
-
Addressing mediapersons at Telangana Bhavan, Rama Rao exuded confidence that the High Court verdict would be in favour of Group-1 job aspirants
-
The bench, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, noted that students had already arrived at examination centers and felt that issuing an interim order at this stage would cause "substantial dislocation" in conducting the exam, which the bench was unwilling to do.
-
The Court cannot interfere with the examination, students must have already reached the examination hall, it said
-
The bench took note of the fact that the report of the panel was almost complete and granted two more weeks for filing the same
-
This comes as the Supreme Court is to take up a special leave petition filed by the Group-I aspirants against the controversial GO 29 on Monday.
-
Says such issue falls under the policy making domain of the executive and requires wide consultations with various stake-holders
-
A Bench of Justices MM Sundresh and Pankaj Mithal grant bail to the son of gangster-politician and former MLA Mukhtar Ansari, who died in jail a few months ago
-
Says Prohibition of Child Marriage Act cannot be stunted by personal laws
-
Centre’s stand against criminalisation of marital rape reflects a deep-rooted patriarchal mindset
-
According to the cause list, a bench of Justices M. M. Sundresh and Aravind Kumar is expected to address the case. On August 13, the Supreme Court extended the interim bail granted to Boinpally. Previously, on March 20, the court noted that the businessman had been in custody for 18 months and ordered his release on interim bail for five weeks.
-
If the government wants to be seen as a credible global leader in digital efforts, it should immediately stop imposing such shutdowns
-
This report will serve as the basis for issuing new job notifications, Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy announced during a review meeting